Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

AMD FireStream 9270 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 16 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 160W)

Score

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
2
16
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

160W
TDP
15W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
VSA-101
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
TeraScale
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
180 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
6.0
3.3
OpenGL
1.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
-
© 2025 - TopCPU.net