AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 210W)
NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
6880 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
+3863%
39.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2023
FireStream
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2070 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
60
800
Shading Units
7680
40
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
206.4 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
619.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.63 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.63 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
619.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
210W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
AD103
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
