AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
4320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+2204%
23.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
FireStream
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
800
Shading Units
5120
40
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
AD104
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
