AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3296 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega Nano
+1166%
12.66 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1247 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Vega 10
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT
(215-0894200)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
