AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 340X OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+44%
1 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 340X OEM
0.691 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2015
FireStream
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Oland
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
