AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.10TB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
16096 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB
+6108%
62.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2024
FireStream
Generation
Server Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
4.10TB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
800
Shading Units
16896
40
TMUs
528
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
1000W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GB100
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
104 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
10.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A
