AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 740 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
416 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (64W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+31%
1 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 740
0.763 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2014
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.944 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.78 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
762.6 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.78 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
64W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GK107
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GK107-425-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
