AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA L20
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 48GB VRAM L20 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 275W)
NVIDIA L20 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
10976 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
L20
+5835%
59.35 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2023
FireStream
Generation
Tesla Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
92
800
Shading Units
11776
40
TMUs
368
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
368
-
RT Cores
92
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
322.6 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
927.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
59.35 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
59.35 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
927.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
AD102
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
AD102
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
