AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 220W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
5088 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3070
+1931%
20.31 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Sep 2020
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
46
800
Shading Units
5888
40
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
165.6 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
317.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.31 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.31 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
317.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
220W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GA104
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GA104-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
