AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 12GB VRAM Radeon RX 9070 GRE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 220W)
AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2790MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2272 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 9070 GRE
+3328%
34.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2025
FireStream
Generation
Navi IV
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2790 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
48
-
SM Count
46
800
Shading Units
3072
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
267.8 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
535.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
68.57 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.28 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1071.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
220W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 48
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XL
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
53.9 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
357 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
12.0
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
