AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 980 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1076MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
+506%
6.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2015
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1076 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
2816
40
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
103.3 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
189.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.060 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
189.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GM200
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GM200-310-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
