AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1630
+82%
1.828 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2022
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1740 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
800
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.56 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
TU117
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
TU117-150-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
