AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA A2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
A2
+353%
4.531 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2021
FireStream
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
800
Shading Units
1280
40
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GA107
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
Unknown
256 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
