AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA T400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
T400
+120%
1.094 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
May 2021
FireStream
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
320
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
