AMD FireStream 9170 vs ATI FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (43W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
+4%
0.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
400
16
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
105W
TDP
43W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
Redwood
-
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
