AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 320W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
9408 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080
+9706%
48.74 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Sep 2022
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2205 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
716.8GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
320
Shading Units
9728
16
TMUs
304
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
280.6 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
761.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.74 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.74 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
761.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
320W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV670
GPU Name
AD103
-
GPU Variant
AD103-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
