Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI FireGL V7600

AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI FireGL V7600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (127W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +940%
3.994 TFLOPS
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
4
2048
Shading Units
320
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
R600
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
R600 GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Board Design

274W
TDP
127W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy