Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7100 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

AMD FirePro W7100 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX 590 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7100
3.297 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 590 +115%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Nov 2018
FirePro
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1469 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
36
1792
Shading Units
2304
112
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.44 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.119 TFLOPS
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
445.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Polaris 30
Tonga PRO GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 30 XT (215-0922006)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy