Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6170M vs AMD FirePro W4170M

AMD FirePro W6170M vs AMD FirePro W4170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6170M 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4170M 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock900MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6170M +185%
1.971 TFLOPS
FirePro W4170M
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Apr 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
6
896
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
Opal
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy