AMD FirePro W6170M vs AMD Radeon R7 A265
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W6170M 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 A265 's Advantages
Boost Clock825MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W6170M
+211%
1.971 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A265
0.633 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2014
FirePro Mobile
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
825 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
14
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Emerald
GPU Name
Opal
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
GPU Variant
Opal XT
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
