AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
8960 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation
+1880%
32.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
768
Shading Units
9728
48
TMUs
304
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
120W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Emerald
GPU Name
AD103
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7
