AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM
+253%
5.834 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2015
Release Date
Sep 2016
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Emerald
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
