AMD FirePro W4300 vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
+42%
1.428 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Bonaire
GPU Name
RV770
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
