Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs Intel Arc A580

AMD FirePro W4300 vs Intel Arc A580

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 8GB VRAM Arc A580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 175W)
Intel Arc A580 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
Arc A580 +760%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Oct 2023
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1700 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
3072
48
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
192.0 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
DG2-512
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy