Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI FirePro V3750

ATI FirePro V8800 vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (48W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +650%
2.64 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
4
1600
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
RV730
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

208W
TDP
48W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy