Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (76W vs 100W)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7750
0.512 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +4400%
23.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
320
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
25.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

76W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
AD104
RV730 GL XTX
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net