ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon R7 360E
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360E to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 360E 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360E
+110%
1.613 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2011
Release Date
Dec 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Turks
GPU Name
Tobago
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3
