ATI FirePro V4900 vs Intel Arc A780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3616 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Arc A780
+2246%
18.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2011
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Turks
GPU Name
DG2-512
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
