AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs Intel Arc A780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (200W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
Arc A780
+125%
18.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR6X
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
4096
256
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
200W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Capsaicin
GPU Name
DG2-512
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.0
Shader Model
6.6
