AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 480.4GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
TITAN X Pascal
+37%
10.97 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Aug 2016
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5X
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
480.4GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
28
4096
Shading Units
3584
256
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
171.5 GFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.97 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
342.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Capsaicin
GPU Name
GP102
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
GP102-400-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.0
Shader Model
6.4
