AMD FirePro S9150 vs ATI FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2696 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 235W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150
+3420%
5.069 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
120
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
235W
TDP
73W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Hawaii
GPU Name
RV630
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
