Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 172% (2580MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (210W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
RTX 4500 Ada Generation +1063%
39.63 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
2070 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
60
1792
Shading Units
7680
112
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
206.4 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
619.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.63 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.63 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
619.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
210W
750 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
AD103
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net