Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +2082%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Oct 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
48
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G94B
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Board Design

375W
TDP
75W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy