Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs ATI FireMV 2250

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 375W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jan 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV516
Orthrus
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

375W
TDP
32W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy