AMD FirePro RG220 vs Intel Arc A750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3504 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
Arc A750
+21400%
17.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2010
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro RG
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
M93
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
