AMD FirePro RG220 vs NVIDIA T600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 and 4GB VRAM T600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 40W)
NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
T600
+2036%
1.709 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2010
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro RG
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
80
Shading Units
640
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
53.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.418 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.709 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
53.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
40W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
M93
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
