AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA T600 Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 4GB VRAM T600 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T600 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
T600 Mobile
+93%
2.527 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
780 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
960
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
45.12 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.96 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.053 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.527 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Blackcomb
GPU Name
TU117
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
