Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600

AMD FirePro M8900 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 2600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +988%
1.306 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 2600
0.12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro Mobile
Generation
M7x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
3
960
Shading Units
120
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
120.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
M76
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
M76-M (216MJBKA13FG)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy