Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1125MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
6464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q +1178%
16.7 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
585 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
58
12
Compute Units
-
960
Shading Units
7424
48
TMUs
232
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
261.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.70 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.70 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
261.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
GA103S
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
GN20-E8-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
212 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy