Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 520MX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
912 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +654%
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 520MX
0.173 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
May 2011
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 500M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
12
Compute Units
-
960
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.800 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
172.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
14.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
GF119
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
N12P-GVR-B-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
20W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy