AMD FirePro M6000 vs AMD Radeon 620 Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon 620 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (43W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon 620 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1024MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000
+30%
1.024 TFLOPS
Radeon 620 Mobile
0.786 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2012
Release Date
May 2019
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1024 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.192 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.58 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
786.4 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
786.4 GFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
49.15 GFLOPS
Board Design
43W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Heathrow
GPU Name
Polaris 24
Heathrow XT GL
(216-0835033)
GPU Variant
Polaris 24 XL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3
