AMD FirePro M6000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+300%
4.101 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2012
Release Date
Apr 2019
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
640
Shading Units
1536
40
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
43W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Heathrow
GPU Name
TU116
Heathrow XT GL
(216-0835033)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
