AMD FirePro M6000 vs NVIDIA P106M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 4GB VRAM P106M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 75W)
NVIDIA P106M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
P106M
+190%
2.974 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2012
Release Date
Jan 2019
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Mining GPUs
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1291 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
9
640
Shading Units
1152
40
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
43W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Heathrow
GPU Name
GP106
Heathrow XT GL
(216-0835033)
GPU Variant
GP106-505-KC-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
