AMD FirePro M6000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1035MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max Q
+417%
5.299 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2012
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1035 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
640
Shading Units
2560
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.12 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
82.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.299 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
82.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
43W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Heathrow
GPU Name
GA107
Heathrow XT GL
(216-0835033)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
