AMD FirePro M4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4000 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M4000 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 33W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M4000
+3355%
0.691 TFLOPS
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
11.23GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
512
Shading Units
8
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.116 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.116 GTexel/s
-
-
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
33W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Chelsea
GPU Name
G98
Chelsea XT GL
GPU Variant
G98-700-U2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
80 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
