AMD FirePro M2000 vs NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 and 6GB VRAM RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 35W)
NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2025MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2080 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
+2060%
10.37 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2012
Release Date
Feb 2024
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2025 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
480
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
97.20 GPixel/s
12.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.37 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.37 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
162.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
33W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Turks
GPU Name
AD107
Turks GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
