AMD FirePro M2000 vs Intel Arc Pro A60M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 and 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 95W)
Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1300MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1568 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60M
+1009%
5.325 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2012
Release Date
Jun 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
12.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
166.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.325 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
33W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Turks
GPU Name
DG2-256
Turks GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
Unknown
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
