AMD FirePro M2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+412%
2.458 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2012
Release Date
Apr 2020
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
480
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
12.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
33W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Turks
GPU Name
TU117
Turks GL
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
