Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M2000 vs Intel Arc A370M

AMD FirePro M2000 vs Intel Arc A370M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 and 4GB VRAM Arc A370M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 35W)
Intel Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Arc A370M +561%
3.174 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2012
Release Date
Mar 2022
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.60 GPixel/s
12.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
99.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.349 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.174 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
793.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

33W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
DG2-128
Turks GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net