AMD FirePro D500 vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 274W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro D500
+122%
2.227 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2014
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
243.8GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
24
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
800
96
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
69.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.227 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
556.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
274W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
RV770
Tahiti LE GL
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
